After skiing on Sunday, I got to watch the last of the duals, semi's and final round. Urtour worked, well sort of. While it was better than no coverage, it could have been much better. Between runs, they zoomed in on a headwall in the distance, their camera has a great zoom and should be used to cover the event. They had one camera setup on the skiers right of the course, halfway down the middle section and used the view a lot. The side view does show speed, but that is about it as far as I'm concerned. You certainly can't see what the skis are doing and it's difficult to even see who has the lead. They did have one camera setup at the bottom that showed the front view, but it only showed 1 skier and was very brief.
It would be a much better presentation to switch the side view camera with the great zoom and the bottom camera. The bottom camera could show the skiers at the start, then switch to the bottom camera showing both skiers. It would actually be great to have 3 cameras at the bottom, 2 zooming in on each skier with a split screen and 1 that shows both courses.
The bottom line is I had no idea who won the round and really didn't see much skiing, although I did see the skiers go by. From what I could tell, Digravio wooped up on Cota in the semi's, getting down first with what looked like a solid run, but lost 19-16?
Another thing totally missing from the presentation is an explanation or justification for the judged results, besides the skiers knees separated while landing the 2nd air.
One of the most interesting parts of the Urtur coverage was the chat board. I never did look to see how many peeps were watching the event, but it seemed like there were about 20 people chatting during the contest. It appeared that at least 3 or more of the viewers were injured ranked competitors, who were justifiably stoked to get to virtually attend the contest. One of the viewers was Sho Kashima I believe, I'm wondering if Shane was watching also as SVC? Anyways, it sounded like 3 of them were recovering from knee surgeries and from what I gathered, all 3 of them did the damage while pounding the zipperline, not resulting from crashes.
I commented the courses were way to easy and that didn't go over to well with most except for SVC. I asked whether the skiers were pivoting or carving as I couldn't see anything from the video angle. I got the reply that some were pivoting and some were carving and not to feel bad that I couldn't see it, because the judges can't see it either.

There was no response to my suggestion of placing 3 moguls in zipperline to see who can hold the line by skiing over the moguls. Maybe the concept could not be comprehended by any of the viewers.
I'm still convinced the courses are way to easy at this level of competition and that's the very reason the competitors are getting knee injuries from pounding the zipperline while carrying way to much speed resulting from the artificial man made course cadence/symmetry. Another result of the easy courses are the judging results. At this level, it seems the only thing separating the skiers is the amount of bobble after the second air or the scoring differential of the executed jump. In both cases, the air/jump seems to determine the winner, regardless of the skiing. One has to wonder why they even have moguls on the run, they are only there for something to ski around between jumps. Why is it that no one, from racers to professional mogul skiers, no one cares what the skis are doing when moguls are involved?